POJIA破甲
地图 / CVE-2026-92389: TFTP direction confusion

CVE-2026-92389: TFTP direction confusion

其他弱点 / Unlabeled / #4022568

厂商
curl
严重程度
低危
赏金
—
弱点
Unlabeled
研究员
@giant_anteater
披露日期
2026-10-14
资产
https://github.com/curl/curl
CVE
CVE-2026-92389

该报告还没有中文解读。

原文摘录

摘自原文(8376 字符中的一小部分)
curl's TFTP state machine accepts either direction's opening response regardless of which one was requested. A malicious TFTP server can answer an RRQ with ACK block 0, which flips curl into transmit mode and causes it to drain whatever read source the handle's sticky `CURLOPT_READDATA` points at, …
原文中的代码
// lib/tftp.c:766-781
case TFTP_EVENT_ACK: /* only valid reply to WRQ — no upload check */
  result = tftp_connect_for_tx(state, event);
  break;

case TFTP_EVENT_DATA: /* only valid reply to RRQ — no upload check */
  result = tftp_connect_for_rx(state, event);
  break;

默认不展示报告全文。以上为简短摘录,完整复现过程请阅读原文。版权归研究员与 curl 所有。

时间线

  • 报告提交
  • 公开披露
阅读 HackerOne 原文 ↗作者 @giant_anteater · 版权归作者与 curl 所有

同类报告

June 2022 Incident ReportHackerOne · 2022-07-01HTML-injection in PDF-export leads to LFIVisma Public · — · $500DOM XSS on duckduckgo.com searchDuckDuckGo · 2020-06-14An attacker can archive and unarchive any structured scope object on HackerOneHackerOne · 2022-04-18Java (Maven): Actually fix the use of insecure protocol to download/upload artifactsGitHub Security Lab · — · $4,000Handling of `tracking` command allows making arbitrary blind requests with user's cookies from Grammarly Extension's originSuperhuman (formerly Grammarly) · 2019-08-01